Should I stream with Windows Media or Shoutcast/MP3?

If you are concerned about accessibility, Shoutcast/MP3 has a slight edge over Windows Media due to all of the major audio players being able to play MP3s. Windows Media is pervasive however, as it comes pre-installed on over 95% of today's new computers.
 
Considering sound quality, Windows Media does have better sound for low-bitrate voice content (24kbps and lower)
 
If you were to stream with Windows Media, we strongly encourage you to use the Pull Broadcasting method, as it is more stable and reliable than the Push method. To broadcast in the Pull method, you'll need to secure a static address (either a static IP address or a dynamic DNS service from no-ip.com) and an open port on your network router. Streaming with Shoutcast doesn't require this extra setup, as its Push method is quite stable.
 
Lastly, Shoutcast has an administration page that lets you view the current number of connected listeners, the peak connected listeners, and a log of stream activity. Streaming with Windows Media does not include these statistics.
  • 1 Users Found This Useful
Was this answer helpful?

Related Articles

How do I: Setup Sam Broadcaster Encoders for Windows Media

Setup Encoder You have set up a streaming server the next step is to create an encoder that can...

Can I stream to both dial-up and broadband users using Windows Media Streaming ?

Yes, you can select mutiple bitrates , say 128k and 24k for broad and narrow band connections....

How do i get an embedded player on my site?

To embed a Player in your web site you have two options; 1. You can use JW Player see this URL;...

Load Balancing Windows Media Live Content

This service is for Live Webcasting Windows Media Content requiring load balancing capabilities...

How Do I: Stream audio and video content to mobile phones and PDAs.

This document explains some of the strategies for best delivering your audio and video content to...